Ir para conteúdo

Suíça Descriminalisa!


Canadense

Recommended Posts

  • Usuário Growroom

http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss_news/Mixed_feelings_over_new_Swiss_cannabis_law.html?cid=36977488

September 30, 2013 - 11:00

From October 1, an adult caught smoking cannabis in Switzerland can escape formal legal proceedings by simply paying a fine. Reactions to the relaxed law, which brings the Swiss in line with other western nations, are divided.

Thick sweet-smelling smoke spirals slowly upwards from a secluded courtyard in the Les Grottes neighbourhood not far from Geneva railway station.

“Sure this change is a good thing,” says *Dani, a young cannabis smoker. “I’ve been caught by the police before and I had five grams on me – they thought I was a dealer. I know lots of people who’ve had similar problems.”

Growing, consuming and dealing cannabis are all forbidden in Switzerland. But from Tuesday, like a simple traffic offence, anyone over 18 caught in possession of up to ten grams of cannabis will receive a CHF100 ($110) fine and not have it put on their criminal record.

Supporters of the revision, which was approved by parliament a year ago, argue that liberalising the legislation and shifting from criminal offence to misdemeanour is a small but realistic approach to cannabis consumption.

The change brings Switzerland in line with other European countries that tolerate dope smoking in small amounts (see map). Up to 500,000 people in Switzerland, which has a population of eight million, are believed to be occasional cannabis smokers, with officials noting a downward trend over the past decade.

Dani is not totally happy, however. “Quite frankly I think it should have been legalised and controlled by the state. At least then there would be a lot less delinquency.”

Trivialising drugs

Opponents, meanwhile, say decriminalising cannabis is contrary to the will of the Swiss people. Five years ago Swiss voters threw out a government proposal to legalise the possession, consumption and controlled trade in cannabis. Four years earlier, parliament had refused to discuss the issue.

On his lunch break in Geneva’s Cropettes park, *Jean-Philippe, a 45-year-old French statistician, said the new law was a step in the wrong direction. “Ten grams is a lot and CHF100 is not at all a deterrent. It will simply make consumption more common and trivialise the issue.”

Varying attitudes towards cannabis and the new law were also found among people in Zurich.

“It makes it too easy to possess drugs and not to be punished. Because I think marijuana can be a step into a career of drugs,” said Michael, 40, at the railway station.

Health and drug experts, on the other hand, believe that relaxing the law is unlikely to have an impact on national cannabis consumption. Quite the contrary, they say, pointing to Portugal and the Netherlands, which have tolerant soft drugs policies and where consumption of cannabis has fallen among young people.

Meanwhile, the Swiss debate continues; even former dope smokers are undecided.

“Ten years ago I would have been in favour of legalising cannabis,” said Marie, who has two teenage boys. “But today we shouldn’t minimise the dangers. In the 1990s, skunk [a strain of cannabis] had a THC level [the main active chemical in the drug] of about five per cent and was already powerful – today it can reach 30 per cent. It’s almost like a hard drug.”

Lighting up

Around 180 million people use cannabis as a drug according to the UN World Drug Report (June 2013).

In Switzerland 28 per cent of residents aged 15 and over said they had consumed cannabis once in their lives (versus 25% for the EU average). Some 5.1 per cent aged 15 and over said they had consumed cannabis once in the past 12 months. Consumption is highest among 15-24-year-olds: 17 per cent said they had tried cannabis once in the past 12 months.

According to a Unicef report published in April 2013, 24 per cent of young children aged 15 said they had used cannabis in the past 12 months for the 2009-2010 period. This figure was the second highest after Canada, but down from 38 per cent in 2001-2002.

  • Like 2
Link para o comentário
Compartilhar em outros sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Visitante
Responder

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Processando...
  • Tópicos

  • Posts

    • Salve galera, tudo certo?! Alguns anos sem entrar aqui na casinha, mas como eu vi que tem alguns Growers retornando à casa e outros novos chegando, resolvi postar uma "atualização jurídica" (que não é tããão atual assim) para todos os usuários que já "rodaram/caíram" nesses anos todos de cultivo!!  Todos nós sabemos do julgamento do RE 635.659 (Recurso no STF para descriminalização do porte de maconha), agora chegou o momento de revisar as antigas condenações.  Sabe aquela transação penal assinada? Aquela condenação pelo 28 (que não foi declarada inconstitucional na época)?? Aquela condenação do seu amigo pelo 33, mas que se enquadrava nos parametros de um grower??? Pois então, chegou o momento de revisar todos esses processos para "limpar" a ficha de todos(as) os(as) manos(as) jardineiros(as)!! "O Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ) dará início, em 30 de junho, ao mutirão nacional para revisar a situação de pessoas presas e/ou condenadas por porte de até 40 gramas de maconha ou seis plantas fêmeas. A realização do mutirão cumpre determinação do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) ao julgar recurso sobre o tema em junho de 2024, que resultou na fixação de parâmetros para diferenciar o porte de maconha para uso pessoal do tráfico. Entre o dia 30 de junho e 30 de julho, os tribunais da Justiça Estadual e regionais federais farão um esforço concentrado para rever casos de pessoas que foram condenadas por tráfico de drogas, mas que atendam aos critérios do STF: terem sidos detidos com menos 40 gramas ou 6 pés de maconha para uso pessoal, não estarem em posse de outras drogas e não apresentem outros elementos que indiquem possível tráfico de drogas. De acordo com da Portaria CNJ n. 167/2025, os tribunais atuarão simultaneamente para levantar os processos que possam se enquadrar nos critérios de revisão até o dia 26 de junho. Este é o primeiro mutirão realizado no contexto do plano Pena Justa, mobilização nacional para enfrentar a situação inconstitucional dos presídios reconhecida em 2023 pelo STF. O CNJ convidará representantes dos tribunais que atuarão diretamente na realização do mutirão para uma reunião de alinhamento na próxima semana, além de disponibilizar o Caderno de Orientações." LINK DO CNJ Caso o seu caso se enquadre, ou conheça alguém que também passou por essas situações, sugerimos buscar um Advogado de confiança ou entrar em contato aqui neste tópico mesmo com algum dos Consultores Jurídicos aqui da casinha mesmo!! Bless~~
    • Curitiba é sempre pior parte hahahaha!
    • o teu chegou? o meu já passou por Curitiba mas tá devagar (pelo menos o pior já passou) kkkkkkkkkk
×
×
  • Criar Novo...