Ir para conteúdo

[EUA] "California Marijuana Legalization 2016: With 10 Legalization Efforts Afoot In The Golden State, Which Is Most Likely To Pass?"


felco

Recommended Posts

  • Usuário Growroom

08/11/2015 - Galera ta dando ate briga! São muitas associações propondo vias diferentes! Aqui uma lista que acredito ilustra essa variedade:

 

2016 California Marijuana Legalization Initiatives          
A comparison of the various proposed marijuana ballot issues          
Initiative Title and Sponsors Taxation and Use of Revenue Communities Allowed to Ban Marijuana Businesses? Business Rules Personal Possession Limits Legal Relief For Previous Marijuana Convictions?
The Adult Use of Marijuana Act [Michael Sutton and Donald Lyman] 15% excise tax on retail sales. Revenues would be used to investigate legalization outcomes, develop marijuana DUI protocols, support communities harmed by past drug policies, sponsor marijuana research and fund various social programs. Yes Recreational licenses would only be granted to California residents, with existing medical marijuana businesses receiving priority. Delivery services would be permitted and local governments could allow marijuana consumption at marijuana shops. Rules would be established for appellations of origin and organic labels. Up to 1 ounce of marijuana, 4 grams of marijuana concentrates and six marijuana plants. Yes
Cannabis Control and Taxation Act [George Mull, California Cannabis Association] 5% excise tax on retail sales. Revenues would go to marijuana research, state preschool programs, environmental protection and cleanup programs and pediatric medical research. No Recreational licenses would only be granted to California residents. Those associated with alcohol and tobacco companies could not receive licenses. Up to six marijuana plants and up to 1 ounce of marijuana and 4 grams of marijuana concentrates on a highway or in a public space. Not specified
The Control, Regulate and Tax Cannabis Act of 2016 [ReformCA] 15% retail tax on edibles and concentrates; 10% tax on all other marijuana products. Revenues would go to local governments and various statewide social, safety, environmental and research initiatives. Yes Marijuana would be regulated similarly to alcohol. Recreational licenses would only be granted to California residents, with existing medical marijuana businesses receiving priority. Up to 1 ounce of marijuana and 100 square feet of garden space. Yes
The 2016 California Bipartisan Decriminalization of Cannabis Act [Jason and Lara Collinsworth, founders of Love Genetics] 15% excise tax, plus 5% implementation tax. Half of all revenues would go to public schools. Yes Medical dispensaries would become recreational shops on Jan. 1, 2017. Concentrates made with dangerous solvents and delivery services would be prohibited. Up to 5 pounds of dried marijuana, 1 pound of extracts, 3 gallons of liquid extracts and 500 square feet of garden space. Yes
The Safe Communities, Parks and Schools Act of 2016 [SaferCA, founded by Chad and Marinda Hanes] Purchases would be taxed at 50 cents per gram of dry product, $3.30 per gallon of liquid-infused products and $2 per gram of concentrate. Revenues would be distributed to drug abuse programs, public land funds and medical marijuana research. No Existing medical marijuana businesses would not face penalties until recreational licenses are issued. Delivery services would be permitted. Up to 30 grams of dried marijuana and either six mature plants or 25 square feet of garden space, whichever is greater. Yes
The California Cannabis Hemp Initiative [Berton Duzy] Excise taxes would not exceed 10% of the retail price. Half of all revenues would fund development of hemp businesses. No Operators would be regulated similarly to alcohol businesses and would follow health and safety rules established for the herbal products industry. Up to 12 pounds of dried marijuana and 99 flowering female plants. Yes
The California Craft Cannabis Initiative [Heather Burke and Omar Figueroa] Total taxes would not exceed 30% of a product’s retail value. No California residents and dispensaries operating for at least a year could operate in the recreational market. Rules would be established for trademarks, appellations, craft cultivator licenses and organic labels. Up to six marijuana plants. Not specified
The Marijuana Control, Legalization and Revenue Act of 2016 [Americans for Policy Reform] Excise taxes would not exceed 15% of a product’s retail value. Revenues would go to education, conservation, drug abuse programs, public safety, marijuana research, minority organizations and local government general funds. Yes California residents and medical marijuana businesses operating for at least a year would have priority for commercial cultivation licenses. Rules would be established for appellations, artisan cultivator licenses and organic labels. Personal cultivation limits could be set by local neighborhood standards. Not specified
Community Act to Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis of 2016 [Alice Huffman, president of the California NAACP] 10% cannabis tax. No Delivery services would be permitted. Up to 1 ounce of marijuana and 25 square feet of garden space. Not specified
The Cannabis Legalization Act of 2016 [Sam Clauder, California Cannabis Unity Campaign] Revenues would go to education, substance abuse programs and marijuana research. No In the absence of local regulations, marijuana consumption by those 21 and older would conform to tobacco regulations. Not specified Not specified

Fonte: http://www.ibtimes.com/california-marijuana-legalization-2016-10-legalization-efforts-afoot-golden-state-2166983

Planilha: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6aehw7qCTO_SXQ4WFFHRTBVVWM/view?usp=sharing

Ps.: Simplismente não consegui formatar isso melhor!

----

08/10/2015 - Antigos:

"Big Marijuana Reforms Included in Senate Spending Package"

Fonte: http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/marijuana_law/federal-marijuana-laws-policies-and-practices/
--

rxZhw.jpg  12/10/2015

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/10/11/voices-ore-legalizes-pot-and-nobody-cares/73646658/

--

Indiana Senate Announces Bill to Legalize Marijuana and Hemp Production

http://nationalreport.net/indiana-senate-announces-bill-legalize-marijuana-hemp-production/

--

Colorado monthly marijuana sales eclipse $100 million mark

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_28947869/colorado-monthly-pot-sales-pass-100-million-mark

**

O movimento em torno da legalização da Cannabis está muito forte, todos estamos vendo a inevitabilidade da Legalização. O argumento de que a Proibição não funciona está ganhando espaço diante de FATOS. Agora é possivel expor a verdadeira 'Porta de Entrada' que é na verdade o Trafico Ilegal de drogas, agora vemos possoas fazendo essa associação já vendo TAMBÉM o exemplo FENOMENAL do TABACO. Hoje socialmente desencorajado, socialmente tolerado e eficientemente afastado dos JOVENS, lembro que na minha idade todo mundo fumava em toda rodinha(tenho 30) e hoje a mulecada fuma ainda cigarro, mas já não tem aquele apelo.

A VERDADE está do nosso lado, são MILHARES de anos de USO e se tá na pista é porque é COISA BOA!

SAAAAAALLLLLVVEEEEE GROOOOWWWWWROOOOOOMM TU TA ESCRITO NESSA HISTORIA!!!!

****

 

Link para o comentário
Compartilhar em outros sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Visitante
Responder

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Processando...
  • Tópicos

  • Posts

    • Salve galera, tudo certo?! Alguns anos sem entrar aqui na casinha, mas como eu vi que tem alguns Growers retornando à casa e outros novos chegando, resolvi postar uma "atualização jurídica" (que não é tããão atual assim) para todos os usuários que já "rodaram/caíram" nesses anos todos de cultivo!!  Todos nós sabemos do julgamento do RE 635.659 (Recurso no STF para descriminalização do porte de maconha), agora chegou o momento de revisar as antigas condenações.  Sabe aquela transação penal assinada? Aquela condenação pelo 28 (que não foi declarada inconstitucional na época)?? Aquela condenação do seu amigo pelo 33, mas que se enquadrava nos parametros de um grower??? Pois então, chegou o momento de revisar todos esses processos para "limpar" a ficha de todos(as) os(as) manos(as) jardineiros(as)!! "O Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ) dará início, em 30 de junho, ao mutirão nacional para revisar a situação de pessoas presas e/ou condenadas por porte de até 40 gramas de maconha ou seis plantas fêmeas. A realização do mutirão cumpre determinação do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) ao julgar recurso sobre o tema em junho de 2024, que resultou na fixação de parâmetros para diferenciar o porte de maconha para uso pessoal do tráfico. Entre o dia 30 de junho e 30 de julho, os tribunais da Justiça Estadual e regionais federais farão um esforço concentrado para rever casos de pessoas que foram condenadas por tráfico de drogas, mas que atendam aos critérios do STF: terem sidos detidos com menos 40 gramas ou 6 pés de maconha para uso pessoal, não estarem em posse de outras drogas e não apresentem outros elementos que indiquem possível tráfico de drogas. De acordo com da Portaria CNJ n. 167/2025, os tribunais atuarão simultaneamente para levantar os processos que possam se enquadrar nos critérios de revisão até o dia 26 de junho. Este é o primeiro mutirão realizado no contexto do plano Pena Justa, mobilização nacional para enfrentar a situação inconstitucional dos presídios reconhecida em 2023 pelo STF. O CNJ convidará representantes dos tribunais que atuarão diretamente na realização do mutirão para uma reunião de alinhamento na próxima semana, além de disponibilizar o Caderno de Orientações." LINK DO CNJ Caso o seu caso se enquadre, ou conheça alguém que também passou por essas situações, sugerimos buscar um Advogado de confiança ou entrar em contato aqui neste tópico mesmo com algum dos Consultores Jurídicos aqui da casinha mesmo!! Bless~~
    • Curitiba é sempre pior parte hahahaha!
    • o teu chegou? o meu já passou por Curitiba mas tá devagar (pelo menos o pior já passou) kkkkkkkkkk
×
×
  • Criar Novo...