Canadense

se for de cabelo, se depila tudo senao tu da FU... Totalmente full brazilian.. se for da urina, come bastante gordura, faz bastante exercicio, e muita agua por uma semana. E umas duas taca de vinho na refeciao tb ajuda alem de ser benefico.

caralho... muito show,.... Eu adoro brinquedo de crianca msm, comprei 2 desses...

cara, vejo meus parentes, todos caretas, ACABADOS.... nao que eu sou uma especimen top... mas po, eu com 34 tou com 3 cabelo branco, o negocio funcionando, sem rugas... obvio que num tenho mais a exuberancia da juventude, mas comparado aos meus parentes e amigos caretas... vish bato de 10.... outra coisa e num ser pai... vixe, ter crianca te estraga. tenho um cliente com 2 filhas, e dois anos mais velho, o cara parece que tem seus 40+

.... tem gente q fala a mesma coisa so pq vc planta seus pes ai tb...

se eles fazem tantas coisas horriveis, que prendem oos por fazer.... lamentavel ver maconheiro a favor da proibicao EDIT: Num vem ao caso?!?!?!?!?!! JOVEM, ESSE E O CASO ponto final. OBS, duvido que seus pais plantavam tb, vc acha que eles nunca compraram??

Sim, talvez era pra venda, E DAI???? VC nunca comprou maconha? Se tem oferta, tem mercado.

TRUCO! MARRÉCO

po, aqui em casa rola altas jogatinas....

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/08/22/justin-trudeau-admits-to-smoking-pot-since-becoming-an-mp/ Those actions speak for themselves,’ Harper says of Trudeau’s admission to smoking pot as MP Justin Trudeau, who has endorsed legalizing marijuana, is making no apologies for smoking pot once as a Member of Parliament, while Prime Minister Stephen Harper had a decidedly unimpressed reaction to the revelation. Chris Selley: Maybe Justin Trudeau can convince Stephen Harper of the insanity of our marijuana laws We’ve never seen a major federal party leader out on this limb. NDP leader Tom Mulcair is for decriminalization, as Jack Layton was. The Paul Martin Liberals couldn’t even pull that off — I’m not convinced they ever really intended to — and since then, they’ve had a leader who once advised high school students not to “park your life at the end of a marijuana cigarette.” Neither party’s 2011 election platform mentioned illicit drugs at all. (The Greens support legalization.) And the Conservatives, naturally, promised to “crack down on organized drug crime.” “For Mr. Trudeau, I think those actions speak for themselves and I don’t have anything to add,” Harper told an audience in Nunavut Thursday. The Liberal leader told The Huffington Post Canada‘s Althia Raj that he had a “puff” three years ago. He was first elected in 2008. Speaking later on Thursday, Trudeau said he had not regrets about his drug use. “No, it wasn’t a mistake,” Trudeau said in response to a question in Quebec City. “I do not consume cannabis. I am not a big consumer at all. I tried it… “I’ve never tried other types of hard drugs. I am not a consumer of marijuana but, yes, I’ve already tried it. I used it — maybe five or six times in my life.” Trudeau said he smoked pot once about three year ago with friends. “We had a few good friends over for a dinner party, our kids were at their grandmother’s for the night, and one of our friends lit a joint and passed it around. I had a puff,” Trudeau told The Huffington Post. The revelation will likely create additional fodder for the ruling Conservatives, whose attacks ads against Trudeau have questioned his judgement as a leader. The Huffington Post asked all three of the major party leaders if they smoked pot at any time. Harper said he never had tried cannabis, while NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair said he had smoked pot, but would not go into details on when he had or how he got it. Trudeau agreed to a 20-minute interview on the matter saying he wanted to be fully transparent because of his legalization position. He said he smoked pot about five or six times but it “has never really done anything for me.” In the candid interview, Trudeau said his late brother, Michel Trudeau, was facing marijuana possession charges before he died in 1998, and that was a factor in his position on the issue. Trudeau said that he doesn’t drink much and that’s he’s never smoked cigarettes. He also said he doesn’t drink coffee — a statement that political reporters will need to be monitor carefully during 2015 campaign stops at small town Tim Hortons. Unsurprisingly, given social media’s demographics skewing towards youth and writers, it seems that Trudeau’s remarks about abstaining from coffee sparked more controversy than his pot dabbling. The new Liberal leader has made the pot issue one of the few high-profile planks of his policy plans. Initially, he said he supported decriminalization but in July announced he wanted to go further. “I’m actually not in favour of decriminalizing cannabis. I’m in favour of legalizing it,” he told a B.C. crowd. “Tax it, regulate. It’s one of the only ways to keep it out of the hands of our kids because the current war on drugs, the current model is not working. We have to use evidence and science to make sure we’re moving forward on that.” According to a Health Canada study, 39% of Canadians have tried pot at least once in their lives. http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/08/22/justin-trudeau-admits-to-smoking-pot-since-becoming-an-mp/#ooid=Y3Y2Z4ZDrMS4Xoet1LHVR9sXKxvNidyr

po meiokilo por ano.... foda em...

consulte ao seu medico

GJIROKASTRA, Albania — The last time police tried to enter the mountainside village of Lazarat near this historic southern city last summer, they prompted a ferocious firefight a local police commissioner describes as “very much like a real war.” Speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of being ostracized, he said he was part of a special forces operation during which sniper units occupied high ground as SWAT teams moved in to arrest a handful of people working in fields surrounding the village. They were no ordinary fields: Lazarat is known as Albania’s drug capital, notorious for its cannabis and lawlessness. The annual crop earns almost $6 billion, according to the Italian financial police. Although local police dispute that figure, they admit that marijuana production is booming. Last year’s raid didn’t last long. When officers began cutting down cannabis plants, 15 SUVs mounted with heavy machine guns materialized and started firing. “We were drawing indiscriminate fire from 20 positions, including heavy machine guns and anti-tank missiles,” the commissioner said. “I saw a 70-year-old grandmother shooting at us with a heavy machine gun. I thought I was going to die.” Worried about civilian casualties, the police withdrew as snipers disabled the SUVs with explosive bullets. They haven’t been back. The commissioner said that drugs traffickers have taken advantage of a political power vacuum during the formation of a government following national elections in June to invest large funds in the fields this year. Law enforcement agencies have taken few preventive measures, enabling Lazarat’s illegal trade to flourish. Any moves against the village now could prompt a “bloody war,” he added. Instead, the police spend the better part of the summer stopping water trucks from entering the village and arresting migrant laborers headed there. They seize any cannabis shipments they notice coming out. Last year, the haul amounted to nearly 15 tons of marijuana, while another ten tons were seized at various borders. Cannabis is usually planted in May and harvested in September. Up to 90 percent of village residents — 7,000 in all — are believed to take part in the business. As Albania’s economy has slumped in the last few years thanks to the economic crises in neighboring Greece and Italy, Lazarat has prospered. Intelligence reports suggest the village cultivated more than 60 acres of land this year, an estimated 300,000 plants that could yield as much 500 tons of marijuana. Photographs taken with long-range zoom lenses show terraced plantations that have turned the barren scrapes of mountain land into a lush green oasis. Journalists trying to enter the village risk as much as police. The traffickers patrol the main road and trail cars to discourage reporters from bringing unwanted publicity. Last month, traffickers spotted two local journalists and a French videographer. Telnis Skuqi, a local correspondent for the Albania Telegraphic News Agency, says three people driving a Ford cut the journalists off as they were driving away. “They warned that we would end up dead if we didn’t stop filming,” he says. Villagers have also taken random pot shots at passenger cars on the highway Lazarat overlooks in revenge for various police operations. When police shot a villager wanted for kidnapping in 2007, a mob attacked and burned the police station in Gjirokastra. An armored personal carrier now parked on the station’s lawn serves as a reminder. Thanks to the threat of major civilian casualties if police attempt to move into Lazarat, only political will can solve the problem, the police commissioner says. That, he elaborates, means “a decision from the prime minister’s office and nothing less.” http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/130815/europe-marijuana-capital-lazarat-albania

sera que e por isso que sempre acreditamos quando disseram que no fim do ano legaliza?

Marijuana increases positivity A just-published study found that THC from marijuana increased activity for positive emotional content. Marijuana enhances happiness which could explain the enormous drop in suicides, especially among young adult men, in medical marijuana states. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Aug 5. pii: S0924-977X(13)00195-8. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.06.009. [Epub ahead of print] The endocannabinoid system and emotional processing: A pharmacological fMRI study with ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Bossong MG, van Hell HH, Jager G, Kahn RS, Ramsey NF, Jansma JM. Abstract Various psychiatric disorders such as major depression are associated with abnormalities in emotional processing. Evidence indicating involvement of the endocannabinoid system in emotional processing, and thus potentially in related abnormalities, is increasing. In the present study, we examined the role of the endocannabinoid system in processing of stimuli with a positive and negative emotional content in healthy volunteers. A pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was conducted with a placebo-controlled, cross-over design, investigating effects of the endocannabinoid agonist ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on brain function related to emotional processing in 11 healthy subjects. Performance and brain activity during matching of stimuli with a negative (‘fearful faces’) or a positive content (‘happy faces’) were assessed after placebo and THC administration. After THC administration, performance accuracy was decreased for stimuli with a negative but not for stimuli with a positive emotional content. Our task activated a network of brain regions including amygdala, orbital frontal gyrus, hippocampus, parietal gyrus, prefrontal cortex, and regions in the occipital cortex. THC interacted with emotional content, as activity in this network was reduced for negative content, while activity for positive content was increased. These results indicate that THC administration reduces the negative bias in emotional processing. This adds human evidence to support the hypothesis that the endocannabinoid system is involved in modulation of emotional processing. Our findings also suggest a possible role for the endocannabinoid system in abnormal emotional processing, and may thus be relevant for psychiatric disorders such as major depression.

... vai ver o controle no colorado.... LIBERA ESSA PORRA!

... todos querem o titulo de maior produtor de maconha do mundo. IMO, (de maconha que presta) os eua vem primeiro depois canada.

... as minhas folhas vem to bubble bag, entonces, ja vem meio curada na agua,.

poderia o STF estar esperando ver o que acontece no uruguai pra ver como procede?

Marijuana Regulation Is Largely an Illusion in Denver Too, but So What? Jacob Sullum The Justice Department's crackdown on medical marijuana has been notably less heavy-handed in Colorado than in other states. While the feds have shut down hundreds of dispensaries in California and continue to target businesses that supply cannabis to patients in Washington, John Walsh, the U.S. attorney for Colorado, has contented himself with sending threatening letters to 50 or so medical marijuana centers he deemed too close to schools. Hundreds of others continue to operate, unthreatened, unraided, and unseized. The usual explanation for this striking difference can be summed up in one word: regulation. While neither California nor Washington explicitly allows dispensaries, which operate in a legal gray area unregulated by the state, since 2010 Colorado has licensed them, laying out specific, picayune, and often cumbersome rules for their operation. But as a state audit released last March showed, Colorado's vaunted regulatory system is largely an illusion, strict in theory but unenforced in practice. A recent audit of marijuana oversight in Denver, which is home to more cannabis operations than the rest of the state combined and was regulating the industry before the state did, found something similar. According to the report, which was released last week by Denver Auditor Dennis Gallagher, the city's Department of Excise and Licenses "does not have a basic control framework in place for effective governance of the City’s medical marijuana program." Here are the audit's highlights: 1. The City’s medical marijuana records and data are incomplete, inaccurate, and at times inaccessible. 2. The Department lacks formal policies and procedures to govern the medical marijuana business licensure process. 3. The coordination between the City and the state for dual medical marijuana licensure has been poor. 4. Deadlines are either not established or not enforced for key steps in the medical marijuana licensure process. 5. The medical marijuana licensure process lacks management oversight, adequate staffing, and proper segregation of duties. 6. The medical marijuana licensure fee was established arbitrarily. 7. Key information has not been kept up-to-date as medical marijuana policies have evolved. The Department's lack of follow-up on license applications, and in conjunction with State law, has allowed some medical marijuana businesses to operate in the City without a valid City license. Further, the Department does not know how many medical marijuana businesses are operating in Denver. Since recreational marijuana will be legal in the state effective January 2014 as a result of Amendment 64, it is critical that the City develop and implement a robust system for regulating marijuana-related businesses before the current problems are exacerbated by a new surge of recreational marijuana license applications. Opponents of legalization have latched onto the audit as further evidence that approving Amendment 64 was a huge mistake and that implementing it will be a disaster. But to me the real lesson here is that Colorado seems to be doing OK despite more than a decade of tolerating a legal marijuana industry, an industry that was officially unregulated for most of that time and to a large extent remains unregulated in practice. NORML's Paul Armentano makes this point in a recent interview with The Verge (even while regretting that the government so far has not delivered the regulation it promised). "We've been told that the reason we can't change [marijuana policy] is because if we do, the sky will fall," Armentano says. "The sky is not falling in Colorado. People that live in Colorado recognize that, and people outside of Colorado will recognize that as well."

http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/bestoftv/2013/08/08/dr-sanjay-gupta-marijuana.cnn.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Tqg2y3yYR0&feature=youtu.be (CNN) -- Over the last year, I have been working on a new documentary called "Weed." The title "Weed" may sound cavalier, but the content is not. I traveled around the world to interview medical leaders, experts, growers and patients. I spoke candidly to them, asking tough questions. What I found was stunning. Long before I began this project, I had steadily reviewed the scientific literature on medical marijuana from the United States and thought it was fairly unimpressive. Reading these papers five years ago, it was hard to make a case for medicinal marijuana. I even wrote about this in a TIME magazine article, back in 2009, titled "Why I would Vote No on Pot." Well, I am here to apologize. I apologize because I didn't look hard enough, until now. I didn't look far enough. I didn't review papers from smaller labs in other countries doing some remarkable research, and I was too dismissive of the loud chorus of legitimate patients whose symptoms improved on cannabis. Instead, I lumped them with the high-visibility malingerers, just looking to get high. I mistakenly believed the Drug Enforcement Agency listed marijuana as a schedule 1 substance because of sound scientific proof. Surely, they must have quality reasoning as to why marijuana is in the category of the most dangerous drugs that have "no accepted medicinal use and a high potential for abuse." Dr. Sanjay Gupta is a neurosurgeon and CNN's chief medical correspondent. They didn't have the science to support that claim, and I now know that when it comes to marijuana neither of those things are true. It doesn't have a high potential for abuse, and there are very legitimate medical applications. In fact, sometimes marijuana is the only thing that works. Take the case of Charlotte Figi, who I met in Colorado. She started having seizures soon after birth. By age 3, she was having 300 a week, despite being on seven different medications. Medical marijuana has calmed her brain, limiting her seizures to 2 or 3 per month. I have seen more patients like Charlotte first hand, spent time with them and come to the realization that it is irresponsible not to provide the best care we can as a medical community, care that could involve marijuana. We have been terribly and systematically misled for nearly 70 years in the United States, and I apologize for my own role in that. I hope this article and upcoming documentary will help set the record straight. On August 14, 1970, the Assistant Secretary of Health, Dr. Roger O. Egeberg wrote a letter recommending the plant, marijuana, be classified as a schedule 1 substance, and it has remained that way for nearly 45 years. My research started with a careful reading of that decades old letter. What I found was unsettling. Egeberg had carefully chosen his words: "Since there is still a considerable void in our knowledge of the plant and effects of the active drug contained in it, our recommendation is that marijuana be retained within schedule 1 at least until the completion of certain studies now underway to resolve the issue." Not because of sound science, but because of its absence, marijuana was classified as a schedule 1 substance. Again, the year was 1970. Egeberg mentions studies that are underway, but many were never completed. As my investigation continued, however, I realized Egeberg did in fact have important research already available to him, some of it from more than 25 years earlier. High risk of abuse In 1944, New York Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia commissioned research to be performed by the New York Academy of Science. Among their conclusions: they found marijuana did not lead to significant addiction in the medical sense of the word. They also did not find any evidence marijuana led to morphine, heroin or cocaine addiction. We now know that while estimates vary, marijuana leads to dependence in around 9 to 10% of its adult users. By comparison, cocaine, a schedule 2 substance "with less abuse potential than schedule 2 drugs" hooks 20% of those who use it. Around 25% of heroin users become addicted. The worst is tobacco, where the number is closer to 30% of smokers, many of whom go on to die because of their addiction. There is clear evidence that in some people marijuana use can lead to withdrawal symptoms, including insomnia, anxiety and nausea. Even considering this, it is hard to make a case that it has a high potential for abuse. The physical symptoms of marijuana addiction are nothing like those of the other drugs I've mentioned. I have seen the withdrawal from alcohol, and it can be life threatening. I do want to mention a concern that I think about as a father. Young, developing brains are likely more susceptible to harm from marijuana than adult brains. Some recent studies suggest that regular use in teenage years leads to a permanent decrease in IQ. Other research hints at a possible heightened risk of developing psychosis. Much in the same way I wouldn't let my own children drink alcohol, I wouldn't permit marijuana until they are adults. If they are adamant about trying marijuana, I will urge them to wait until they're in their mid-20s when their brains are fully developed. Medical benefit While investigating, I realized something else quite important. Medical marijuana is not new, and the medical community has been writing about it for a long time. There were in fact hundreds of journal articles, mostly documenting the benefits. Most of those papers, however, were written between the years 1840 and 1930. The papers described the use of medical marijuana to treat "neuralgia, convulsive disorders, emaciation," among other things. A search through the U.S. National Library of Medicine this past year pulled up nearly 20,000 more recent papers. But the majority were research into the harm of marijuana, such as "Bad trip due to anticholinergic effect of cannabis," or "Cannabis induced pancreatitits" and "Marijuana use and risk of lung cancer." In my quick running of the numbers, I calculated about 6% of the current U.S. marijuana studies investigate the benefits of medical marijuana. The rest are designed to investigate harm. That imbalance paints a highly distorted picture. The challenges of marijuana research To do studies on marijuana in the United States today, you need two important things. First of all, you need marijuana. And marijuana is illegal. You see the problem. Scientists can get research marijuana from a special farm in Mississippi, which is astonishingly located in the middle of the Ole Miss campus, but it is challenging. When I visited this year, there was no marijuana being grown. The second thing you need is approval, and the scientists I interviewed kept reminding me how tedious that can be. While a cancer study may first be evaluated by the National Cancer Institute, or a pain study may go through the National Institute for Neurological Disorders, there is one more approval required for marijuana: NIDA, the National Institute on Drug Abuse. It is an organization that has a core mission of studying drug abuse, as opposed to benefit. Stuck in the middle are the legitimate patients who depend on marijuana as a medicine, oftentimes as their only good option. Keep in mind that up until 1943, marijuana was part of the United States drug pharmacopeia. One of the conditions for which it was prescribed was neuropathic pain. It is a miserable pain that's tough to treat. My own patients have described it as "lancinating, burning and a barrage of pins and needles." While marijuana has long been documented to be effective for this awful pain, the most common medications prescribed today come from the poppy plant, including morphine, oxycodone and dilaudid. Here is the problem. Most of these medications don't work very well for this kind of pain, and tolerance is a real problem. Most frightening to me is that someone dies in the United States every 19 minutes from a prescription drug overdose, mostly accidental. Every 19 minutes. It is a horrifying statistic. As much as I searched, I could not find a documented case of death from marijuana overdose. It is perhaps no surprise then that 76% of physicians recently surveyed said they would approve the use of marijuana to help ease a woman's pain from breast cancer. When marijuana became a schedule 1 substance, there was a request to fill a "void in our knowledge." In the United States, that has been challenging because of the infrastructure surrounding the study of an illegal substance, with a drug abuse organization at the heart of the approval process. And yet, despite the hurdles, we have made considerable progress that continues today. Looking forward, I am especially intrigued by studies like those in Spain and Israel looking at the anti-cancer effects of marijuana and its components. I'm intrigued by the neuro-protective study by Lev Meschoulam in Israel, and research in Israel and the United States on whether the drug might help alleviate symptoms of PTSD. I promise to do my part to help, genuinely and honestly, fill the remaining void in our knowledge. Citizens in 20 states and the District of Columbia have now voted to approve marijuana for medical applications, and more states will be making that choice soon. As for Dr. Roger Egeberg, who wrote that letter in 1970, he passed away 16 years ago. I wonder what he would think if he were alive today.

maluko, depois do snowden, tu acha que tem privacidade online???