Canadense

alguem corrige as cagada que fiz no titulo?

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00038-013-0487-9 Health literacy and substance use in young Swiss men Abstract Objectives The purpose of the present study was to describe health literacy and its association with substance use among young men. Methods The present study was part of the Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors that included 11,930 Swiss males participating in initial screening from August 2010 to July 2011. Self-completed questionnaires covered use of three substances and three components of health literacy. Results Roughly 22 % reported having searched the Internet for health information and 16 % for information on substances over the past 12 months. At-risk and not at-risk users of alcohol (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.50 and 1.46), tobacco (AOR = 2.51 and 1.79) and cannabis (AOR = 4.86 and 3.53) searched for information about substances significantly more often via the Internet than abstainers. Furthermore, at-risk users reported better knowledge of risks associated with substance use and a marginally better ability to understand health information than abstainers. Conclusions Substance users appear to be more informed and knowledgeable about the risks of substance use than non-users. Consequently, interventions that focus only on information provision may be of limited benefit for preventing substance use.

porra, se conseguirem, retiro todas as piadas de viados que eu contei, alem de pegar meu passaporte e comear a falar batche(macumba)

HAHAHA po paulinho...

imo big maconha, sera compáravel a antartica, brahma, skol... que e tudo uma merda... ae vai ter, os homebrews ou micro IPAs, para um mercado niche e consumidor mais degustador. bando de gente que acha que pagar 600$ 100g de green acha que é caro

num tenho vergonha de dizer isso... essa eleição federal será a primeira vez que eu votarei na vida!

http://news.yahoo.com/video/trudeau-says-supports-legalizing-marijuana-221800516.html Porra, o pai dele era fudido... comia todas... Unico foda que ele votou a favor de sentenças minimas obrigatorias ano passado... mas novo ano, novo cargo, nova posição!

http://www.amsterdam-dance-event.nl/

eu curto ir no ADE... Amsterdam Dance event bagulho é 4 dias com 250 DJ em mais de 80 balada... fui numa balada numa grafica de jornal e num navio alemão

Pot legalization activists are running into an unexpected and ironic opponent in their efforts to make cannabis legal: Big Marijuana. Medical marijuana is a billion-dollar industry — legal in 18 states, including California, Nevada, Oregon and Maine — and like any entrenched business, it’s fighting to keep what it has and shut competitors out. Dispensary owners, trade associations and groups representing the industry are deeply concerned — and in some cases actively fighting — ballot initiatives and legislation that could wreck their business model. That pits them against full legalization advocates, who have been hoping to play off wins at the ballot box last fall in Colorado and Washington state that installed among the most permissive pot laws in the world. Activists are hoping to pass full legalization measures in six more states by 2016. From the point of view of dispensary owners, legalization laws — depending on how they’re written — can have little immediate upside and offer plenty of reasons for concern. For one, their businesses — still illegal under federal law — benefit from exclusive monopolies on the right to sell legal pot, but state measures still don’t end the risks of an FBI raid or Internal Revenue Service audit. Meanwhile, those same federal laws that prohibit growing, selling and using keeps pot prices high. This spring, the Medical Marijuana Caregivers of Maine joined the usual coalition of anti-pot forces of active law-enforcement groups, social conservatives and public health advocates to oppose a state bill that would legalize possession of small quantities of the drug. The medical marijuana lobby argued that criminal organizations would start smuggling pot to neighboring states, and they complained that the bill’s tax plan was unworkable and unfair. “The main objections came from the fact that the bill was not built around Maine’s medical marijuana industry,” Paul McCarrier, a lobbyist for the medical marijuana caregivers group, told POLITICO. “Philosophically, we’re not opposed to the decriminalization of marijuana, but the devil is in the details.” (Also on POLITICO: Book studies 'Marijuana's Frontier') Full legalization advocates, like the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, say it’s all about the money. “There are people who are benefiting financially and would prefer to see nothing change that,” said Erik Altieri, communications director for NORML. “NORML believes the only way to truly ensure access for those patients who need cannabis for medical purposes is to legalize its use for all adults,” he added. “This will provide every adult safe and convenient access to quality cannabis, regardless of whether or not their state legislators think their specific condition ‘qualifies.’” There wasn’t always a major divide in the cannabis camp. The two sides of the movement have long worked together on de-scheduling marijuana as a controlled substance and stopping federal raids on legal dispensaries. Many owners of medical marijuana dispensaries got their start in the broader anti-drug war movement and are still on the same intellectual side of the issue — working to de-criminalize pot. Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/big-marijuana-lobby-fights-legalization-efforts-94816.html#ixzz2aHO6nj7X

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mexico-city-considers-making-marijuana-legal/2013/07/26/8bdda232-f551-11e2-9434-60440856fadf_story.html?hpid=z7 By Fernando Gómez Mont and Jorge G. Castañeda, Published: July 26 Fernando Gómez Mont was Mexico’s interior minister in the administration of Felipe Calderón. Jorge G. Castañeda was minister of foreign affairs in the administration of Vicente Fox. Last year, voters in Colorado and Washington state approved initiatives legalizing the recreational use of marijuana. While the details are being worked out, those watching the developments are in not only the United States. Mexico, too, is taking note, having paid an enormous price waging a costly — and, to a certain degree, futile — years-long crusadeagainst drugs in consonance with the international community’s punitive approach. A growing number of Mexicans are asking logical questions: Why should their leaders follow a path that provokes violence, generates human rights violations, erodes the country’s image abroad and costs a fortune — mainly to stem the northern flow of drugs? Why spray and uproot marijuana fields in the hills of Oaxaca, search for tunnels in Tijuana and incarcerate “weed” traffickers in Monterrey if consumption is made legal in parts of the United States? Why deploy such an enormous effort to deter drug trafficking if Washington does virtually nothing to stop the flow of firearms to Mexico — and has concluded that it can, and should, prevent migrants from Mexico and Central America from entering the United States? If Congress can “secure” the border against people, using walls and drones, why can’t it do the same against drugs or guns and, in the process, respect Mexico’s right to design its own policies? These sentiments are part of the reason for a change in Mexican attitudes toward drugs in general and marijuana in particular. Two former presidents — Ernesto Zedillo andVicente Fox, who both vigorously fought drug trafficking and consumption while in office — have concluded that this approach is doomed and that a better policy would include decriminalizing marijuana use and commerce. Then-President Felipe Calderóncalled on the U.N. General Assembly last year to change its focus, eliminating the perverse incentives that strengthen transnational organized crime and gravely affect the rule of law and democracy in some countries. Mexico is a highly conservative country whose population remains largely opposed to legalizing marijuana. But an increasing number of business, political and academic leaders are shifting their views. The city council of Mexico City, which has authority to legislate health and law enforcement issues, is contemplating a measure that would, in effect, allow the regulated possession and use of marijuana. Already, Mexicans can legally possess five grams of marijuana, an amount much smaller than what is commonly sold, bought or shared. Effectively decriminalizing marijuana would be in line with liberal attitudes in the capital and laws that rest on the firm belief that the right to privacy includes certain personal choices, even — or especially — when not shared by the majority. We and other former cabinet secretaries — Pedro Aspe, finance minister to Carlos Salinas, and Juan Ramón de la Fuente, health minister to Zedillo — have joined with Mexico’s leading public intellectual and a prominent social activist to push for legalization in Mexico City. The four of us occupied senior posts directly related to the drug issue in Mexico’s previous four administrations. Along with Héctor Aguilar Camín, editor of the monthly Nexos, and Maria Elena Morera, founder of México Unido Contra la Delincuencia (Mexicans United Against Crime), we are encouraging Mexico City authorities to proceed promptly. For practical and political reasons, our effort is limited to decriminalizing the use of marijuana in the federal district, though some believe that the same case can be easily made for other drugs in the whole country. A reform that restrains its effects to marijuana is achievable; going furtherdoes not seem feasible today. Another reason for moving slowly, though firmly, is the impact this decision would have on the relationship between Mexico and the United States. President Enrique Peña Nieto opposes legalization but seems open to a broad debate and to whatever consensus would emerge — locally, nationally or regionally. He may accept Mexico City’s decision even if he doesn’t like it, much as President Obama seems to have resigned himself to the Colorado and Washington legislation. Mexico has ratified treaties banning illicit substances, but these international agreements allow governments to set their own policies within certain limits; consider Dutch and Portuguese leniency. The United States should support its neighbor as it seeks leeway for its own stance, even if that conflicts with U.S. policy. Mexicans have paid a high cost in the struggle against drugs. We know that this war cannot be won. This fight should be waged by physicians rather than armed forces. Decriminalization of marijuana is not a silver bullet, but it would be a major step away from a failed approach. Mexico City is the place to start, thanks to the example set in Colorado and Washington state.

http://www.growroom.net/board/topic/51509-notas-verdinhas-de-maconha-no-fantastico/#entry1063150 A new study finds that exposure to crack cocaine in the womb is not as harmful to a child's health as being raised in poverty. Perhaps the hysteria over “crack babies” was misplaced. Babies whose mothers smoked crack cocaine while pregnant do not face the kinds of health risks that many scientists initially feared, a new study has concluded. In 1989, Hallam Hurt, who was then the chair of neonatology at Philadelphia’s Albert Einstein Medical Center, began to study the long term health prospects for children born to mothers who had smoked crack during pregnancy. At the time, Philadelphia was at the center of the nation’s crack epidemic, and a separate study found that one out of every six babies born at the city’s hospitals was to a mother who had tested positive for cocaine, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported This past June, after 25 years of following people born at the height of the city’s crack epidemic, Hurt unveiled the results of her study, which concluded that, in terms of overall negative health effects, a mother’s crack use was not as harmful as whether or not the child grew up in poverty. “Poverty is a more powerful influence on the outcome of inner-city children than gestational exposure to cocaine,” Hurt said in a recent lecture. Hurt followed 224 near-term or full-term babies, half who had mothers who used cocaine during pregancy, and half who did not. All of the babies, the majority of whom were African American, were born into low-income families. When comparing the two groups of babies, Hurt found that crack use of the mother during pregnancy did not result in significantly lower IQ, as many researchers had posited Instead, Hurt found that the IQ of her subjects was lower across the board than national averages, leading her to conclude that poverty was the reason. Hurts’ conclusions have been backed up by other research. Claire Coles, a psychiatry professor at Emory University who has been following a group of poor Atlanta children to measure the effects of crack cocaine, is unsurprised by Hurts’ findings. "As a society we say, 'Cocaine is bad and therefore it must cause damage to babies,' " Coles told the Philadelphia Inquirer. "When you have a myth, it tends to linger for a long time." Hurt’s study, which was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, does note that pregnant mothers who use crack risk a host of possible health complications, including drastically higher blood pressure, premature labor, and damage to the placenta. Still, the notion that babies whose mothers smoked the drug while pregnant were relegating them to a lifetime of misery was not supported by her findings.

CARALEO.... eu tou sonhando...

... VC que pensa

hobby pra uns, carreira pra outros... qual o problema?

maldito jesus cristo poe na idea de ze povin q dinheiro é sujo

hahahha porra, eu com 100 plantas e 5 ciclos tou cheio de divida.... obvio que o cara nunca plantou, nem sabe o que e plantar maconha

pau no cu da record e do datena... os cara tem mo pinta de rede regional...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/20/us-mexico-drugs-idUSBRE96J01420130720 (Reuters) - Mexico could legalize marijuana within the next five years, stripping brutal drug cartels of a major source of income, former President Vicente Fox said on Friday. Fox, who battled the powerful cartels while president between 2000 and 2006, has since become a staunch advocate of reforming Mexico's drug laws, arguing that prohibition has helped create the criminal market that sustains the gangs. Under his successor, Felipe Calderon, Mexico launched a military offensive to crush the cartels, but the violence spiraled instead, and more than 70,000 people have been killed in drug-related bloodletting since the start of 2007. Legalization was the best way of ending the "butchery" of the drug gangs, Fox said as he hosted a conference in support of the measure in his home state of Guanajuato in central Mexico. President Enrique Pena Nieto, who took office in December, is opposed to legalization, but he has said that the decision by the U.S. states of Washington and Colorado to legalize recreational marijuana use has given him a more open mind. Asked by Reuters whether Mexico could legalize marijuana by the time Pena Nieto's term ends in 2018, Fox said: "I think it's going to happen much sooner. Once California gets into this, Mexico is going to be obligated to speed up its decision process." Previous bills to legalize marijuana in Mexico have failed to move forward and a majority of Mexicans oppose such a move. California, which borders Mexico, rejected a 2010 measure to legalize cannabis, though medical marijuana is legal. Plans are still underway to legalize recreational use of marijuana in California, and Tom Angell, a spokesman for Marijuana Majority, a U.S.-based group in favor of cannabis reform, said the state was very likely to vote again by 2016. Fox's view reflects a wider trend in Latin America where a number of former and current leaders, including Guatemalan President Otto Perez, are backing alternative approaches to U.S.-backed strategies of eradication and interdiction. The 71-year-old Fox, whose election in 2000 for the conservative National Action Party (PAN) ended seven decades of one-party rule in Mexico, worked closely with the United States during his time in office to combat Mexican drug gangs. But after leaving office, he became a fierce critic of the strategy pursued by his party colleague Calderon. That angered many in the PAN, and Fox sparked more uproar during last year's presidential election campaign by encouraging Mexicans to support Pena Nieto of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, which ruled Mexico between 1929 and 2000. Fox has been campaigning for marijuana legalization at a series of events this year in the United States and Mexico. On Friday he was joined by former Microsoft executive James Shively, who plans to create the first U.S. national marijuana brand, as well as a wide range of activists and academics that included former Mexican health minister Julio Frenk.

É como olhar no espelho, né chuck?

a manteiga da tiazinha cheia de folhas po...

como maconheiro quero a legalizaao e regulamentaao de todo o ciclo da cannabis aqui como la... quem fizer tem meus impostos.