Canadense

... combater a ignorancia alheia é muito desgastante. povo tem preguiça FUUUUUUUUUU....

comprei um semana passada, mas num tem jogo que eu curto pra ele... semana que vem vou comprar um xbone.

Bom ver um pastor seguindo os ensinamentos de Cristo...

... Aqui num é tribunal de justiça desportiva... Aqui é jogo ao vivo... É só levantar na area.

Porra, quando acordei, loguei aqui e achei que o topico era anistia para bandido... Já tava vindo aqui corrigir, bandido não, ATIVISTA Mas agora que li, galera banida tem que criar user novo e ficar pianinho, e bola pra frente.... E NÃO ABRIR TOPICO RECLAMANDO DA DOR NO CU DEPOIS! #butthurt

Galera, seis tem que conhecer mais a cadeia carbóxila do THC. eu hein.... http://drugsdata.org/archive/rhodium/pdf/the.total.synthesis.of.cannabinoids.pdf

NÃÃÃÃÃÃÃO!

nem vi, é o msm estudo??? se for rola um merge...

... po, se tu falou...... Agora, imagina se vc só tivesse fumado maconha, quanto mais de inteligencia vcs teriam?

RESEARCH Study: Medical Marijuana Legalization Doesn't Lead to More Crime Researchers Say Decriminalizing Medicinal Use May Reduce Homicide, Assault Rates March 27, 2014 Dr. Robert Morris, associate professor of criminology The legalization of medical marijuana has sparked debate across the nation for decades. Some have argued that medical marijuana’s legalization will lead to higher crime rates. But according to a new study at UT Dallas, legalization of medical cannabis is not an indicator of increased crime. It actually may be related to reductions in certain types of crime, saidDr. Robert Morris, associate professor of criminology and lead author of the study published in the journal PLOS ONE. “We’re cautious about saying, ‘Medical marijuana laws definitely reduce homicide.’ That’s not what we’re saying,” Morris said. “The main finding is that we found no increase in crime rates resulting from medical marijuana legalization. In fact, we found some evidence of decreasing rates of some types of violent crime, namely homicide and assault.” The UT Dallas team began its work in summer 2012 after repeatedly hearing claims that medical marijuana legalization posed a danger to public health in terms of exposure to violent crime and property crime. The study tracked crime rates across all 50 states between 1990 and 2006, when 11 states legalized marijuana for medical use: Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. Since the time period the study covered, 20 states and Washington, D.C., have legalized marijuana for medical use. Using crime data from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report, the researchers studied rates for homicide, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, larceny and auto theft, teasing out an effect for the passing of medical marijuana laws. “This new information, along with continued education of the public on the realities of the negative aspects of smoking marijuana — which there are considerable negative attributes — will make the dialogue between those opposed and in favor of legalization on more of an even playing field. It takes away the subjective comments about the link between marijuana laws and crime so the dialogue can be more in tune with reality.” Dr. Robert Morris, associate professor of criminology None of the seven crime types increased with the legalization of medical marijuana. Robbery and burglary rates were unaffected by medical marijuana legalization, according to the study. These findings run counter to the claim that marijuana dispensaries and grow houses lead to an increase in victimization because of the opportunities for crime linked to the amount of drugs and cash that are present. Morris said the models accounted for an exhaustive list of sociodemographic and econometric variables that are well-established links to changes in crime rates, including statistics on poverty, unemployment, college education, prison inmates and even the amount of beer consumed per person per year. Data came from the U.S. Census Bureau, the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. “The results are remarkable,” Morris said. “It’s pretty telling. It will be interesting to see what future studies hold.” Once data are available, the researchers plan to investigate the relationship between recreational marijuana legalization and crime in Washington and Colorado, where the legalized marijuana marketplace is taking shape. While it’s too soon to say if there are definitive drawbacks to legalizing marijuana for medical purposes, Morris said, the study shows that legalization does not pose a serious crime problem, at least at the state level. “This new information, along with continued education of the public on the realities of the negative aspects of smoking marijuana — which there are considerable negative attributes — will make the dialogue between those opposed and in favor of legalization on more of an even playing field,” Morris said. “It takes away the subjective comments about the link between marijuana laws and crime so the dialogue can be more in tune with reality.” UT Dallas doctoral student Michael TenEyck, assistant professor Dr. J.C. Barnes and associate professorDr. Tomislav V. Kovandzic, all from the criminology program, also contributed to the study as co-authors.

http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/pot-smoking-students-better-at-school-than-marginalized-tobacco-smoking-peers-1.1745098 Students who only smoke marijuana do better at school than classmates who smoke just tobacco, or who smoke both tobacco and pot, says a new study, which tracked substance use among teens over 30 years. Researchers from the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health analyzed data from a survey administered to nearly 39,000 Ontario students between 1981 and 2011. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health asked students in Grades 7, 9 and 11 about their tobacco and marijuana use, and their academic performance. The study found that marijuana-only users did better at school than their counterparts who smoked only cigarettes or who smoked both cigarettes and marijuana. However, the findings reflect the fact that fewer students smoke tobacco today compared to 30 years ago, and those that do make up a very “marginalized, vulnerable” population, says lead study author Michael Chaiton, assistant professor in epidemiology and public health policy. “It’s better relatively,” Chaiton says of marijuana-only users’ academic performance.About 92 per cent of tobacco users also use marijuana, the study found. However, only 25 per cent of marijuana uses also smoke tobacco. Marijuana users don’t outperform non-users, Chaiton says. “Now there is a distinction between marijuana use and co-use with other substances, and it’s an indication of the changing social norms. So it’s not an absolute that they do better; it’s that social norms have changed and the population of people who use marijuana are more like the general population.” The study was published in the March edition of the Journal of School Health. In the 1980s, when the study began, there was less marijuana use among students. And those who did smoke pot also smoked tobacco. At the time, pot use among tobacco smokers was very low. Thirty years later, that had switched, the researchers found. As tobacco use declined, marijuana use shot up. And among the remaining tobacco users, marijuana use is now very high. One reason for the statistical switch, Chaiton says, is the effectiveness of anti-tobacco messaging in recent years. “The population of youth smokers right now is one that is a fairly marginalized population, quite a vulnerable population, so they are at high rates of cannabis use but also of other drugs and other behaviours,” Chaiton says. “So the change in trends is that this is a social phenomenon. This is not that tobacco is causing this, it is something that has changed socially in the role of tobacco in society.” Now that marijuana smoking has become more of a social norm, Chaiton says, programs aimed at keeping youth from risky behaviours such as drug abuse must take into account two factors: that more students now smoke marijuana compared to 30 years ago, and that students who smoke tobacco are more likely to use marijuana or other drugs and engage in at-risk behaviours such as vandalism and theft. As marijuana use becomes more prevalent and socially acceptable, Chaiton says, the focus must turn to developing programs for youth that properly educate them on the risks. Tobacco and marijuana are “similar drugs in many different ways,” Chaiton notes, and “people dramatically underestimate the risks associated with cannabis use, particularly among youth.” “I would argue that we need to start talking about them in the same way and start addressing them in the same types of interventions,” he says, particularly given the growing public discussions about decriminalizing or legalizing marijuana. “If we do legalize or change the regulations in dramatic ways, that Read more: http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/pot-smoking-students-better-at-school-than-marginalized-tobacco-smoking-peers-1.1745098#ixzz2x5UmDutO Minha opinião disso tudo, (e olha que vou ouvir um monte) mas só burro fuma careta. Alem de provado o mal que faz, num da barato.

Vc num acha que aquela "teia" é de verdade né?

http://www.newsweek.com/marijuana-industry-pleads-congress-treat-us-regular-business-231864 The House Budget Committee isn’t the most august room in Congress, but it commands respect, what with its oil portraits of former chairmen including Leon Panetta, who went on to be Defense Secretary and CIA director. But it was the site on Tuesday of a briefing by the National Cannabis Industry Association, which you can think of as the pot trade group. So it’s probably not surprising that one of the questions asked of Rep. Jared Polis, a Colorado Democrat leading the fight for reform of federal marijuana laws, was how many of his colleagues smoked pot. Five or 10, he guessed. But he noted he’d never seen any smoke. And besides, since the House is made up of so many old members, the number was bound to be small. It’s a sign of how far the cannabis industry has grown that their leaders are here in Washington, chatting up reporters and fanning out to meet their representatives the same way, say, onion growers might. With marijuana decriminalized in Washington state and Oregon and medical marijuana allowed in 20 other states and the District of Columbia, those who sell and distribute legal weed need a voice in Washington where any number of laws and regulations still treat them like outlaws. For instance, because of laws designed to keep drug cartels from protecting their financial assets, it’s almost impossible for cannabis dealers to use regular banks for their business, forcing them to carry around bundles of cash as if they were, um, drug dealers. What’s worse, some dispensaries have had to segregate their cash so it doesn’t smell like pot. Making payroll, buying goods from suppliers, all with cash, is like something from the Middle Ages. The Obama administration has tried to ease some federal banking regulations, but it’s not clear whether that’ll be enough to convince skittish banks -- loathe to run afoul of Dodd-Frank, let alone this -- to let cannabis dealers open checking accounts or give them loans. To boot, cannabis dealers are not allowed to deduct their business expenses because of IRS regulations aimed at drug dealers. With an effective tax rate that can run as high as 85 percent, the cannabis industry has won the support of Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform, which has joined in the fight to repeal the regulation. Any number of other laws are keeping cannabis dealers in the doghouse even as voters have made their voices clear across the country. While public attitudes about marijuana have moved sharply in recent years -- as a group, only voters over 65 believe it should remain illegal -- the political climate hasn’t caught up with public opinion. Only a modest number of Congressmen have instituted support for the many bills and laws aimed at treating cannabis sales like any other business. One of them is Dana Rohrabacher, one of President Ronald Reagan’s White House speechwriters, who represents the beautiful coastline of southern Orange County, Calif. (The Oliver Stone drug movie, Savages, was set in Laguna Beach, part of Rohrabacher’s district.) Rohrbacher is a longtime surfer, even at age 66, a firebrand conservative and an outspoken critic of “communist China,” who suggested this week that Obama could be impeached over executive actions on health care and immigration. Still, criminalizing marijuana, Rohrbacher said, “is an absolute waste.” He added: “What is freedom all about? It’s about your right to make decisions.” But he concedes his colleagues will likely prove slow to embrace an issue they think would hurt them politically. To help soften the mood on Capitol Hill, the cannabis trade association asked Celinda Lake, a Democratic pollster, to test public attitudes about marijuana. She found a widespread and growing acceptance of pot legalization, one reflected in other polls and also in popular culture where stoner comedies are blockbuster movies. The data, though, show that the same forces that suggest the Democrats will do poorly in the midterm elections in November -- low turnout among all groups save for the elderly, who lean right -- create a climate that could spook some Congressmen from backing a change in the marijuana laws. Asked if his GOP colleagues might be sympathetic to the argument, Rohrabacher says his fellow Republicans would favor pot reform if it were a secret ballot. Getting them out in the open won’t be easy.

nao use margarina e cannabis, usa mateiga cannabica ou entao poe oleo no chocolate... bem melhor

a então vc num planta indoor?

... quero ver provar que eu obtenho mais que isso.... sou um puta grower tosco! Alem do que, tem minha mãe, minha tia, meu padástro, meus primos, minhas primas... todos eles não fumantes, porem serão consumidores cronicos!

passa por aqui man!

daqui a pouco é nois fi

ele entrou pro exército americano?

agora sim...

num critiquei ninguem.... só quero saber quando é caridade... que me parece é o que é isso, e num tenho nada contra. agora, lucrar com a maconha num tem problema nenhum. Principalmente se o livro fosse financiado pela maconha. Alias, ai, mais que apoio.

bom, IMO, isso equivale mais como uma lampada nova do que algo que a monsanto faz. apenas usam nanotubos pra direcionar luz