Canadense

e olha, tem um monte na rua, imaginem nos, com milhoes de usuario no armario... Por mim, quanto mais viado melhor... assim como os caretas... sobra mais pra mim

Cara, daonde vc tirou isso??? Qual delegado, juiz, ou advogado te falou isso???

Eu acho um absurdo grower falar que vender suja a imagem de growers... me explica como tu chega nessa conclusao??? Pq mamae falou que dinheiro e sujo??? Talvez Jesus??? O comercio ilicito ta ai pra suprir uma lacuna no mercado... muito melhor comprar de uma "pessoa mal intencionada" [sIC] que comecou seu proprio negocio, com uma qualidade melhor, e sem precedencia de violencia. Do que manter o status quo com lucros absurdos de carteis. Grower que vende é um bem pra sociedade, alem do bem pra "imagem" de growers ao redor do mundo. Keep it green!!! Keep it local!!!

nossa... 2 pes... pelamor.. SEM FLAGRANTE NAO TEM TRAFICANTE

... galera no barzyl ( assim como nesse topico) tao falando como conheciam os presuntos pessoalmente... eu hein.... Usando o primeiro nome como a galera cagavam juntos e passava o papel higienico pra limpar o cu. cassia pra ca, o pai do cara pra la. MO FUXICO.... eles morreram, FODASSE. Mudou o preco da maconha??? Do petroleo? FODASSE pagacao de pau viu... porra, ontem teve homenagem de adolecentes ao chorao num praca em maceio... E muita falta do que fazer viu...

meu tbreak vem diariamente umas 8 hrs por dia em media...

It's the only way to fly

Ontem realmente morreu um mito da musica... EH?

Ta vendo... Ja comeou com informao errada, e desde quando o erro e uma dica valiosa??? Se respeite.

Nunca gostei das musicas deles, como pessoa pra mim, nem fede, nem cheira. se tivessemos um mapa carteseano da doideira disso, seria algo assim Lamentavel a morte por isso... um minimo de informação provavelmente ajudaria... msm coisa que rolou com Heath Ledger... nessa idade (pós 30) a brincadeira fica séria.

http://www.alternet.org/silicon-valley-reportedly-full-stoners Silicon Valley Reportedly Full of Stoners Businessweek says tech geeks are heavy medical marijuana consumers. March 4, 2013 | Another major marijuana stereotype just got blown totally out of the water -- this time the idea that consuming cannabis is for unemployed slacker types. In fact, pot is wildly popular in one of America's economic centers, Silicon Valley. According to a new report in Bloomberg's Businessweek, the "physical toll" of computer coding has made Silicon Valley workers key consumers in the medical marijuana industry. In San Jose, which Businessweek dubs the "Bay Area capital of medical marijuana," 106 medicinal marijuana dispensaries span the city's 177 square miles, more than adequately serving its 967,000 residents. One of those dispensaries, Pallative Health Center, told Businessweek that tech workers make up an estimated 40 percent of clients. “We’re seeing people from some semiconductors, lots of engineers, lots of programmers,” Ernie Arreola, 38, the assistant manager, told Businessweek, which noted, "That makes sense, because the shop is an easy shot from some of the area’s biggest employers—Cisco Systems, Google, Adobe Systems, Apple, EBay—and a short drive from dozens more. Also, people in Silicon Valley do like their pot." One medical marijuana executive told Businessweek that marijuana-infused chocolate toffee is a favorite among tech workers, who he says represents about 15 percent of customers. “It does not give the high or intoxicated feeling that you would typically get from a lot of medical cannabis,” Doug Chloupek, CEO of MedMar Healing Center, told Businessweek. “Those who are coding for 15 hours a day with cramping hands, that is the product that allows them to have mental clarity and still get pain relief.” But while Silicon Valley employees are getting stoned in a culture that embraces marijuana use, Businessweek notes policies forbidding drug use and possession at Cisco and Adobe, though neither company screens new employees for drug use. Maybe that's because, as Silicon Valley CEO Mark Johnson told Businessweek, “Pot is an extremely functional drug. Coders can code on it, writers can write on it." Still, as Galen Moore notes at the Boston Business Journal, weed isn't the only drug popular in Silicon Valley: The comments section on the tech news site Hacker News offer a glimpse into prescription drugs that are popular as work aids in Silicon Valley's high-tech culture, including so-called "smart drugs" Provigil (Modafinil) and Nuvigil, and pharmaceutical stimulants like Adderall and Ritalin. Some commenters also challenge Businessweek's assertion that marijuana culture is "raging" in Silicon Valley. It may be news to Businessweek, but the reality has always been that people from all ends of the social spectrum use drugs, pot especially. Not everybody, however, is arrested for it. EDIT:

postei a mssm coisa esse dias... so que sem traducao rola um merge thread

PIEGEL: Mr. Miron, why should heroin, cocaine and marijuana be legal? Miron: The prohibition of drugs is the worst solution for preventing abuse. Firstly, it brings about a black market that is corrupt and costs human lives. Secondly, it constrains people who wouldn't abuse drugs. Thirdly, prohibiting drugs is expensive. SPIEGEL: How expensive? Miron: If it legalized drugs, the United States could save $85 billion to $90 billion per year. Roughly half that is spent on the current drugs policy and half that is lost in taxes that the state could have levied on legal drugs. SPIEGEL: On the other side of the equation, there are many people who would become addicted to drugs. Miron: Let us assume that the consumption of drugs would increase as a result of legalization. Would that be a bad thing? If we apply the standards of economics, that is (at least partially) a good thing. Any policy that prevents me from doing what I'd like to do impairs my happiness. SPIEGEL: Drugs lead to addiction. They impair people's happiness. Miron: Addiction isn't the problem. Many people are addicted to caffeine and nobody worries about that. Many people are addicted to sports, beer or food. That doesn't bother the state either. SPIEGEL: Should the state treat sports and cocaine equally? Miron: The effects of cocaine are described in a highly exaggerated way. There are Wall Street bankers who snort coke; they have high incomes, access to a good healthcare system, are married and have a stable life situation. Many of them subsequently stop taking cocaine. I get the impression that these people enjoy consuming it. Then there are people who smoke crack cocaine and lead lives that are very different from those of stockbrokers; they are people with low incomes, no jobs and poor health. Many of these people come to a sorry end. But cocaine's not to blame for that. Those people's lousy lives are to blame. SPIEGEL: Are you trying to say that crack is harmless? Miron: Can you consume crack for a long time and then give it up? Absolutely, and that's supported by the data. The prohibition lobby exaggerates substantially to help it achieve its goals. Drugs are far less dangerous than people think. It's not clear that consuming marijuana or cocaine has significant negative effects if the product is affordable, if we don't have to risk our lives to get it, and if the product hasn't been diluted secretly with rat poison. SPIEGEL: Are you trying to say it's not dangerous to shoot heroin? Miron: Injecting it is so widespread because, under prohibition, heroin is expensive and injecting makes users high for less money. If drugs were much less expensive, most people would probably smoke heroin rather than injecting it. SPIEGEL: One more time: do you think it would be good if legalization led to an increased consumption of drugs? Miron: If you believe in anything that the Americans claim to believe in -- freedom, individuality, personal responsibility -- you have to legalize drugs. The maxim should be that you're allowed to do it if you're not harming anyone else. There is an assumption that you're harming someone when you take drugs, but the scientific data doesn't support this hypothesis. SPIEGEL: Cocaine makes people aggressive. Miron: The scientific evidence for that is very thin. Most of the evidence that points to a connection between violence and drugs relates to alcohol. Does that mean that alcohol should be banned? In fact, the legalization of all drugs would sharply reduce the amount of violence in the US. SPIEGEL: How? Miron: Prohibition leads to violence. By making a black market inevitable, you generate violence because the conflicts between the parties involved in the drug trade can't be solved by legal means within the judicial system. They are forced into a twilight world in which they have to shoot each other instead of hiring lawyers and taking the matter to court. SPIEGEL: So the state should just let the cartels get on with it? Miron: There are studies that show the level of violence is reduced when the state leaves the drug trade alone, the reason being that the drug dealers have fewer disputes. The latest evidence from Mexico confirms that. Of course there has been drug-related violence there for a long time. But the violence didn't escalate and increase sharply in scale until the president, Felipe Calderón, declared the big war on drugs in 2006. We have calculated that the murder rate in the US could fall by around 25 percent if drugs were legal. SPIEGEL: How would drug prices change as a result of legalization? Miron: Marijuana prices would hardly change. If we compare the black-market prices with prices in places where marijuana is virtually legal today, for example the Netherlands, they are very similar. The prices paid for cocaine could fall substantially. SPIEGEL: Then the whole country would snort coke. Miron: Consumption of the more harmless drugs would probably increase. And there would be a larger number of people who occasionally take a drug. But when single malt whiskey became legal again after the prohibition of alcohol in the US ended, the whole country didn't become addicted to single malt. SPIEGEL: Don't we as a democracy have an obligation to protect the people from themselves? Miron: I think that people who harm themselves with drugs will do it anyway, regardless of whether or not they're legal. SPIEGEL: Don't we have a moral obligation? Miron: If a friend of yours does something that's stupid, do you think about whether it would make the situation better or worse if you intervened? Maybe putting your friend in prison and forcing him to undergo therapy isn't the best solution. Maybe it's better to talk to your friend in a calm and collected way. SPIEGEL: Is talking the solution to the drug problem? Miron: Prohibition certainly isn't the solution. SPIEGEL: Why are drugs prohibited at all? Miron: Naive people believe that if something's illegal, people won't do it any more. That clearly isn't true. Others think that if you make it illegal, the price will rise and fewer people will take the drug. But for some people the price isn't a factor. SPIEGEL: What would a world in which drugs were legal be like? Miron: Like Portugal. There, consumption has been legal for several years and there has been hardly any change in the amount of drug use. Legalization wouldn't greatly increase the rates of use. And if people started to smoke more marijuana, that would be okay too. It's their business. SPIEGEL: Do you seriously want drugs to be sold in supermarkets? Miron: Yes. SPIEGEL: Would prescribing the drugs be a possibility? Miron: A very lax prescription law like the one in California doesn't do any harm, because everyone gets a prescription. But if that's the case, what good does it do? If you have a very strict prescription law, you'll have a black market again. SPIEGEL: What would happen to the black market if drugs were legalized? Miron: You'd have the choice. You could buy your cocaine in a supermarket or from a mysterious Mexican dealer at a street corner who might shoot you. That would drain the black market. SPIEGEL: What would happen to the drug cartels? Miron: If drugs were legalized, many of the big cartels in Mexico would try to use the benefits of their experience by setting up a legal company right away. They'd want to be the first and they've got good products and a good distribution network. It's still highly uncertain whether the drug cartels want legalization. El Chapo Guzmán, the most powerful cartel boss in the world, has a natural advantage because he's a very skilled criminal -- that's why he's so rich. If there was no longer a black market for drugs, Guzmán would lose his advantage. SPIEGEL: Should drugs be taxed? Miron: A substantial tax is a bad idea because it would increase the incentive to set up a black market again. SPIEGEL: Why isn't anyone putting your suggestions into practice? Miron: Many thousands of people working in government posts would lose their jobs as a result of legalization. The rehab centers would lose a lot of customers because many of the people in rehab were forced to go there by the judicial system. The people who build prisons also have an interest in there being large numbers of inmates. In addition to that, the church doesn't like drugs and the church is powerful in America. SPIEGEL: Do you take drugs yourself? Miron: No. I smoked a bit of pot when I was a student, but that was all. But if drugs were legal tomorrow, I'd go out and give them all a try. I doubt I would use them more than once; but after all the research I have done on this issue, I am curious! Interview conducted by Takis Würger

HA! parece meus beq

amanha??? Missil de maconha obviamente! Quero viver ate os tempos dos Laseres de maconha.

Isso e por que eles num sabem coxar... pq os mes quemam como cigarro, certinho

discordo... blunts sao bao demais...

FTFY

Olha a quantidade de tabaco que tem nesse beq EDIT: Diario da Russia??? CUMA?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/27/marijuana-cannon-us-border-seized-mexico?CMP=SOCNETTXT6965 'Marijuana cannon' used to fire drugs over US border seized in Mexico Compressed-air gun mounted on truck could throw 13-kilo packets over fence into California The 'marijuana cannon' seized in Mexicali on Tuesday, which uses an old car engine to generate compressed air. Photograph: AP Police in the border city of Mexicali say they have recovered a powerful improvised cannon used to hurl packets of marijuana across a border fence into California. Police told the Televisa network that the device was made up of a plastic pipe and a crude metal tank that used compressed air from the engine of an old car. The apparatus fired cylinders packed with drugs that weighed as much as 13 kilos, police said. It was confiscated last week after US officers told Mexican police that they had been confiscating a large number of drug packages that appeared to have been fired over the border. Mexican police on the border have recovered a series of similar devices in recent years.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432811004360 Gender effects on amygdala morphometry in adolescent marijuana users Research report Gender effects on amygdala morphometry in adolescent marijuana users aDepartment of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA bDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA cDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA dVA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92161, USA e Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161, USA Corresponding author at: VA San Diego Healthcare System (116B), 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92161, USA. Tel.: +1 858 552 7563; fax: +1 858 552 7414. Received 4 January 2011 Revised 24 May 2011 Accepted 26 May 2011 Available online 2 June 2011 1. Introduction 2. Materials and methods 3. Results 4. Discussion 5. Conclusions Disclosure statement Role of the funding source Acknowledgements References Abstract Adolescent developments in limbic structures and the endogenous cannabinoid system suggest that teenagers may be more vulnerable to the negative consequences of marijuana use. This study examined the relationships between amygdala volume and internalizing symptoms in teenaged chronic marijuana users. Participants were 35 marijuana users and 47 controls ages 16–19 years. Exclusions included psychiatric (e.g., mood and anxiety) or neurologic disorders. Substance use, internalizing (anxiety/depression) symptoms and brain scans were collected after 28 days of monitored abstinence. Reliable raters manually traced amygdala and intracranial volumes on high-resolution magnetic resonance images. Female marijuana users had larger right amygdala volumes and more internalizing symptoms than female controls, after covarying head size, alcohol, nicotine and other substance use (p < 0.05), while male users had similar volumes as male controls. For female controls and males, worse mood/anxiety was linked to smaller right amygdala volume (p < 0.05), whereas more internalizing problems was associated with bigger right amygdala in female marijuana users. Gender interactions may reflect marijuana-related interruptions to sex-specific neuromaturational processes and staging. Subtle amygdala development abnormalities may underlie particular vulnerabilities to sub-diagnostic depression and anxiety in teenage female marijuana users. Highlights ► Examined amygdala volumes of teen marijuana users and controls. ► Gender moderates effect of marijuana use and amygdala morphometry. ► Female marijuana users showed abnormally large right amygdala volumes. ► Worse depression/anxiety linked to larger right amygdalas in female users, who reported more internalizing problems. Keywords Adolescence; Anxiety; Depression; Development; Gender; Marijuana; Tinha varias fotos que o GR num deixou postar. vale uma pena dar uma lida. Quão é credenciado esses medicos num sei...

Acho que um pouco de fé, de oração, não faz mal a nenhum coração. Nessa situação, pensa em procurar um centro espírita, tomar um passe, ouvir uma mensagem boa. Mal não vai te fazer. E se tiver numa bad, po, não pensa duas vezes: pensa em Deus! melhoras abraço! Nossa senhora... ta falando pro mano ir torrar o dinheiro a toa???? centro espirita??? PQP esse GR tem de tudo msm... CENTRO ESPIRITA?????? para...